Comment on AI tool used in thousands of asylum claims failing basic accuracy tests
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 days ago
if ((previous_country.status == “safe”): reject()
now all you need to do is make a database of countries that are safe, starting by importing a list of European countries and North American countries.
Would clear a big backlog.
Armand1@lemmy.world 3 days ago
I assume this is sarcasm. Calling North America (and some European) countries safe is pretty comical.
Codpiece@feddit.uk 3 days ago
And let’s not forget the declaring Rwanda safe debacle.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 days ago
Do suppose mexico is in north america. What european countries are unsafe? Balkans?
France and Ireland do make up a sizeable number. I do agree an individualised approach for the remaining ones would make more sense, but I don’t see a point in wasting time on people who were already in a safe country to begin with and paid a people smuggling gang to bring them across a border.
Codpiece@feddit.uk 3 days ago
Safe by what standards? Yours, Conservatives, Reforms? Are you suggesting everyone should conform to a single state sanctioned religion or be less gay? I think a lot of the asylum seekers probably have a valid reason for moving.
Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 days ago
Most western European countries they are coming from aren’t forcing either of those things