Comment on Has Family Feud ever gone back and given someone an answer they got right?
MichaeleanDouglasse@thelemmy.club 16 hours agoI’m saying there’s room for leniency, and I feel like they should err on the side of “yeah, I get what they mean”.
That’s just it, it isn’t that at all. The points for and even existence of answers is dependent on what people polled before answered. So unless they’re making up the polling results, there isn’t really leeway here.
If the question was “what is 2 + 2?” and literally no people polled responded with “4” then that wouldn’t be an response that would get anyone points.
But what kind of wood? Generic shop class sawdust? Pine (yellow? White?), Cedar. Juniper.
sandalwood is very specific, and of course “yeah that’s what they meant”…. Because of course they meant the right answer. If the right answer bad been cedar, I bet they would have meant that instead.
Yeah, I guess I didn’t think about that. If you hard with being lenient, then everybody has to get that same treatment.
Where did you get the idea that Family Feud rules have any leniency to allow giving out points for creative or unusual answers?
I’m saying they should. Also, the leniency I’m talking about is in the interpretation of the answers.
It’s a poll. If enough people respond with an unorthodox answer, it will be on the board. Awarding points outside of the poll goes entirely against the game.
paraplu@piefed.social 10 hours ago
Maybe reframing it would help: the game is to guess the most likely word from those polled, not the most likely concept.
You’re describing a different game, which might be better suited for playing at home, and probably makes for worse TV.