Comment

A lot of police departments moved away from two person patrols years ago. You’d have to look up the specific reasons but my guess is cost reduction.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
Yet they have the money for military vehicles strange.

source
- LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  A lot of those are surplus and likely given to departments or sold for very little. That practice has contributed a lot to the militarization of police in America.
  
  That should all be taken away from them though. Most of their guns too. A country as developed as the US shouldn’t require an armed para military force to police its citizens and, arguably, the US doesn’t require one.
  
  source
  - chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    The thing is they’re still a high financial drain. The military doesn’t give them the ones that are in good enough condition to still be useful, and they’re a maintenance nightmare.
    
    I worked for a city that accepted one, and it broke down while transporting it to the city the day we took possession and ended up costing the city 200 grand on its first day.
    
    source
    LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Oh, I know! It’s the equivalent of you or I being given a Peterbilt 579 and they we try using as a daily commuter.
    
    source
  - Murse@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    
    A country as developed as the US shouldn’t require an armed para military force to police its citizens and, arguably, the US doesn’t require one.
    
    …we need an armed paramilitary force to police our politicians. I mean, on paper we have one, but in practice they seem to just follow a domestic enemy’s orders with no thought at all so long as that enemy is holding an office like POTUS.
    
    source
  - Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
    And cops that were actually held accountable and had an actually legal duty. youtu.be/7muy6mMpp20
    
    source