Yes and no. AI (the ideal) is labor replacement, similar to the first industrial machines. But instead of manual labor, it is replacing cognitive labor. Under capitalism, when profit is always the end game, labor saving tech will not be used to liberate, but to further exploit the people and rape our planet. This is no different, I think. Usually this kind of capital is held mostly in the hands of one class of people, but this tech is unique in that it has the ability to, once trained, be copied and iterated on by others. Open source, or eventually hacked. Software yearns to be free, in the sense that it can be copied easily. Point is, control over the development and distribution of AI is so difficult that even the “common sense” right* end up feeling betrayed. It mainly benefits the far right and the oligarchic class.
For now, it is not the ideal. But the intentions of the most powerful people seem to continue to race towards unregulated, privately controlled AI. They talk of slowing down, but I don’t have my hopes up after everything that’s happened.
Kushan@lemmy.world 4 days ago
But the left wouldn’t be the left if we weren’t fucking fighting each other all the time instead of the right.
kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
liberals and socialists fighting eachother isn’t leftists fighting eachother, as liberalism isn’t left wing
yuki_gassen@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Idk… Anarchism and ML have history lol
kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
yeah but anarchists aren’t relevant, and real anarchists recognize that marxism is preferable to capitalism
i’d argue that “anarchists” who prefer capitalism to what is in their opinion the wrong type of socialism and spend all their time fighting against “evil tankies” online instead of fighting capitalism, are just edgy liberals larping because they like the radical aesthetic of anarchism