np, also technically it is not a law, it’s a court interpretation about what laws the constitution allows en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
Comment on Citizens United was never about helping people
kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 7 hours agoAs a Canadian, I was entirely ignorant of the Supreme Court’s role in this travesty of a Law. Appreciate the explainer.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 7 hours ago
Supreme court’s decisions are not technically laws, but they’re treated as such as far as I can understand - they set precedent on how some law is to be interpreted and other courts follow it
Roe v Wade was another famous supreme court case that was essentially law, until the court was deemed republican enough to kick an abortion related case at them so they could undo it. Roe v Wade was what protected Americans’ right to get abortions.
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 hours ago
Congress made a law greatly limiting what corporations and organizations could do with regards to publishing electioneering material. Citizens United wanted to publish electioneering material. Federal Election Commission said no. Citizens United sued. Case was appealed to the Supreme Court. SCOTUS said the law violated the first amendment rights of corporations, and overturned it.