Comment on Accurate
untorquer@quokk.au 3 days agoI don’t get it.
He’s been the perfect choice for every major role he’s done and been iconic for it. Everything from matrix to bill and teds to cyberpunk would have been worse with any other actor.
Just because he’s admittedly less flexible doesn’t mean he’s bad at it.
Counterpoint: He was definitely not the perfect choice for Jonathan Harker in Francis Ford Coppola’s Dracula.
I love the guy and I agree he’s good at the roles he sticks to these days, but he kinda ruined that film. (In much the same way that Sofia Coppola ruined The Godfather 3, actually. Why does Francis Ford Coppola keep getting away with this?)
Countercounterpoint: Coppola was the problem 😜
Coppola is certainly a problem.
papalonian@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Idk man. I’m a big Keanu fan and I knew as a kid watching The Matrix for the first time that he was not convincing as an actor. Entertaining, absolutely. Skilled, especially in action choreography, no doubt. But I feel like his roles in movies like the John Wick series (where you aren’t expected to take it super seriously) are the only ones where he doesn’t stick out next to even lesser known actors as heavy handed with his acting.
untorquer@quokk.au 3 days ago
I think in The Matrix the fact that he stands out as a little different and inconsistent adds significantly to the allegory of the movie. I really don’t think the main character in a 90’s movie about the trans experience calls for someone who blends in.
That said he doesn’t stand out all that much. For example, Sandler would be, while i think hilarious(at the time), a completely narrative breaking choice. On the other side, DiCaprio would have “acted” well but broken it as badly by following the assignment too well.