Signal uses donations to keep running. That’s one of the reasons why they don’t need to do this kind of crap. Kinda like Firefox.
It’s sad to see that slowly but surely the Internet gets divided into the more and more useless giant sector and the free and open sector, which just doesn’t get the attention it needs to be attractive enough for most to switch over. And then there’s also this weird shadow area where I often hear those pirate chanties from…
cloaker@kbin.social 1 year ago
Signal literally exists. Free.
FoxBJK@midwest.social 1 year ago
It’s only free because they’re trusting users to donate. That method of generating income for their developers could stop working at any time. Lots of FLOSS projects struggle to find kosher funding.
jkure2@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Come on dog this is literally just ‘yeah well what if we imagine a hypothetical world where MY argument is right, how about that?’
woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, they sell their technology to Meta and Microsoft. WhatApp’s encrypted protocol that was rolled out several years ago is Signal’s. That’s also why Signal will never match all features of those messengers. They cannot drive WhatsApp and such out of business because that would mean Signal is out of business.
afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No. Everyone can use Signal technology for free in their own products. They are not selling it to anyone. Yes, some time ago moxie helped to integrate their encryption algorithm in WhatsApp and that’s that. Very likely that he / the foundation got paid for that service, but it’s not like Signal is funded by selling their technology to anyone. And for sure it’s not like they can’t match WhatsApp features because then WhatsApp would go down the river and they run out of funding…
I don’t know what to say but stuff like this makes me kinda angry. You read about moxie helping implement their encryption in WhatsApp at one point, and then came up with this story that Signal is somehow mainly funded by meta and Microsoft and can’t compete with their products because it would put ms and meta out of business and endanger their own funding this way. Like, please don’t make up stories like that, OK? It’s not a nice thing to do.
If you are really interested here are some actual facts on the matter:
Source: wiki. Took me five seconds to google that. Again please don’t spread made up stories, thanks.
noodle@feddit.uk 1 year ago
Large open source projects like Signal don’t really rely on individual donations, but instead survive off wealthy supporters or sponsors.
supermarkus@feddit.de 1 year ago
Signal has fewer features than non-premium Telegram. Both are open source, neither can be used with alternative servers (unlike Matrix).
cloaker@kbin.social 1 year ago
Signal is peer to peer no?
tebro@lemmy.tebro.fi 1 year ago
It is not