It’s not an opinion piece on health care. Nobody said anything about if universal health care is complicated or not. It’s an article about the economic impacts of a potential sweeping resolution that abolishes private health insurance. It’s also almost 7 years old and no longer relevant.

Are you an economist?

Then why do you think you know more about this subject than the actual economists in the article? Are you a journalists who specializes in writing about the business of health care; particularly in how financial incentives affect the way medicine is delivered? Then why do you think you know more that then Journalist? Especially when we consider that the journalist in question has been doing this for the 90s and specializes in, “scrutinizing the financial interests of insurance companies and hospitals”.

And the NYT in general is rated, “Leans Left”

allsides.com/…/new-york-times-news-media-bias

Funny how you know it’s absurd to think you know more than the experts when it comes to things like medicine or science but when it comes to economics you and everybody else in this sub has it all figured out right?

Or do you also think vaccines cause autism and the world is flat?