Comment on Oh no
atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 hours agoWhy should i not use a term that has been in use for at least a decade? I have specifically mentioned ai generated images to not have it included with the actually useful ai
Comment on Oh no
atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 hours agoWhy should i not use a term that has been in use for at least a decade? I have specifically mentioned ai generated images to not have it included with the actually useful ai
kesslerpartyatmyplace@anarchist.nexus 2 hours ago
It has existed since at least the 1960s,probably earlier, and been common use among SciFi nerds since at least the 80s.
This is not ai. We do not have ai. Nothing currently extant was made with the existence of ai, because ai does not exist at present. If we ever do invent ai, you’re going to look like an excitable wide eyed bigot and it’s going to look cringe as fuck. In the meantime it is used to create buzz and bullshit lies to discipline labor. Contributing to that PR push by using their dishonest language is an active strike against the power of workers, organized and not. It also takes research dollars flops etc from real ai research, which used to be a thing, and would be pretty cool to have around.
I’ll spare you the explanation of why it’s anti human. Be a tool of the oligarchs or don’t.