Have you tried things like Heroforge? It’s pretty good overall, I just make my mini then take a screenshot for the character portrait.
CptHacke@piefed.social 1 day ago
How terrible am I if I use free AI image generators to make character portraits for use in VTT’s? It’s better than stealing human-generated artwork off the internet, right? It still feels cringe, though. :(
Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
CptHacke@piefed.social 22 hours ago
This is actually a really great idea. At least until HeroForge figures out how many people are doing it, and then puts behind a paywall. ;)
Gabadabs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 hours ago
I don’t think it’s hurtful for them. It doesn’t interfere with their business model, and I feel makes people more likely to turn to them in the case they want a mini printed for a home game.
CptHacke@piefed.social 10 hours ago
I think that’s a logical way of looking at it.
HubertManne@piefed.social 1 day ago
I have done it. you quickly get something with the exact features you want. its one of its better uses. If I had the money and a long going campaign going I would have an artist do it up right though.
CptHacke@piefed.social 22 hours ago
I will never, ever make enough money to be able to pay an artist to do custom character portraits for me every time I need one.
HubertManne@piefed.social 14 hours ago
yeah and that is the case for 99% of gamers. using the llm is vs just finding something rando or whatever and folks want it to look like they want it.
apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 day ago
No, its worse.
When you steal human created art off the internet you aren’t actively harming the environment. You arguably dont even harm the artist because you would never pay them anyway.
When you use an ai image generator, you are actively harming the environment, and actively harming artists by supporting tools that are trained on their art without consent.
Just use the human art, or something like picrew where people make things specifically for folks to use to make their characters for stuff like vtt
Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 day ago
I find the environmental argument is always a weak one to make, though. CO2 emissions for non-AI datacenters peaks currently around 210 million tons, with AI datacenters peaking currently around 100 million tons.
So why is more pollution from subject A acceptable, but less from subject B isn't?
I've seen people say because A gives "something of worth", but then that just undermines the whole point of being harmful to the environment. Destruction of the environment is kinda an absolute in that instance, the source shouldn't be the deciding factor in whether or not we accept it.
The same for the water usage thing (which was debunked). AI datacenters use 68 billions gallons annually (at least by 2028 projected). People are upset about that, but not about the 26 trillion gallons that US agriculture uses. All because "something of worth", but if it's that big of a deal why are people focusing on less than 1% of the total consumption? How is that 1% needing protected but the remaining 99% totally disposable?
apotheotic@beehaw.org 19 hours ago
I contain multitudes. I can protest the mass growth of datacentres for other industries as well as for AI.
I hadn’t mentioned water usage, but since you bring it up, AI datacentres are being plopped down willy nilly and sucking up all the water from their local area, causing drought. Thats one stark difference between it and agriculture, which isn’t having the same kind of local effect.
However, the US (and other) agriculture+ industry (again, I contain multitudes) doesn’t get a pass. Estimates vary, but it looks like about 30-50% of US agriculture water usage goes to feed which is destined for livestock for the meat industry. I’d say that a person can be both against AI and an outspoken vegan against the meat industry, wouldn’t you?
TehPers@beehaw.org 17 hours ago
Before AI, people had been advocating against the meat industry, and had pushed for reduced water usage in agriculture and homes, which led to stricter rules against lawns in drought-prone areas. It being drowned out by the advocacy against AI doesn’t mean those voices disappeared, just that there are louder voices now.
I do enjoy the classic “they’re doing bad so I can too” fallacy, though.
Mordikan@kbin.earth 10 hours ago
AI datacenters do not cause drought. There is no evidence to support that claim. And if you think you do have evidence, I would love to see the source.
And you totally can contain multitudes. People should be like that. But they in practice aren't. They follow what is trending. For example, if you look through your comment history how many comments will be pertaining to the US meat industry? How many to datacenters?
I would argue that you care a great deal more about one than the other. Which, going back to my original point, why is that 1% more important than the remaining 99% (or specifically the 50% that you care so much about)?
A_be_seedy@beehaw.org 16 hours ago
I find the electric usage one to be strong. If you have a lot of data centers near, your electric will go up.
Similarly, if you have a data center near you, your water bill will go up, and your well may dry up.
Data centers are demanding incentives from governments across the country with promises of lots of jobs, but they just need the people to supplement their low usage of utilities.
Mordikan@kbin.earth 9 hours ago
That is a valid point, I think. That isn't "but what about the environment" but only when convenient. That is local pricing issue which has a very direct and very trackable impact.
If a datacenter opens next door to you, the utility consumption goes up meaning your bill goes up. Unless the datacenter operators are somehow offsetting that increase financially (and that the money is actually be allocated by the city for that purpose), then there is the real impact of datacenters.
CptHacke@piefed.social 22 hours ago
I completely agree.
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Also you could write down the artist’s name and that way there’s at least the possibility that someone might commission them or purchase art if they like the style.
apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 day ago
Absolutely