Comment on Oh no

• hamsamrich@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Ahh thx 🙏

  source
• atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You would expect that the amount of people complaining about ai generated images would cause people to avoid using them

  source

  • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Nah, now they’re actively taking the work of anti-AI artists, feeding them into AI, and then sending it to them.

    source
  • kesslerpartyatmyplace@anarchist.nexus ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Why?

    I’ve definitely noticed more assholes responding with chatbot generated arguments.

    And don’t call it ai. Industry buzz term. Anti-labor.

    source

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Why should i not use a term that has been in use for at least a decade? I have specifically mentioned ai generated images to not have it included with the actually useful ai

      source

      • kesslerpartyatmyplace@anarchist.nexus ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        It has existed since at least the 1960s,probably earlier, and been common use among SciFi nerds since at least the 80s.

        This is not ai. We do not have ai. Nothing currently extant was made with the existence of ai, because ai does not exist at present. If we ever do invent ai, you’re going to look like an excitable wide eyed bigot and it’s going to look cringe as fuck. In the meantime it is used to create buzz and bullshit lies to discipline labor. Contributing to that PR push by using their dishonest language is an active strike against the power of workers, organized and not. It also takes research dollars flops etc from real ai research, which used to be a thing, and would be pretty cool to have around.

        I’ll spare you the explanation of why it’s anti human. Be a tool of the oligarchs or don’t.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Thank youuuuuu

  source