Comment on [deleted]

• Pudutr0n@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  You pushed the inexplicable, the black box, into a system. Deities/the unknown forces come in all kinds of shapes and formats, not only judeochristian / abrahamic. Maybe it’s not a deity, but it’s where the magic we can’t explain happens. We need axioms for anything, dude. I’m not anti-science, I just think all belief and knowledge is necessarily based in things that cannot be proven… and that’s ok.

  source

  • the_q@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fair enough.

    source
  • crapwittyname@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    We don’t need axioms for empiricism. That’s the entire point. We ask reality questions and infer limited and verifiable knowledge from the results, without ever stating that anything has been proven.

    source

    • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      You actually need axioms for everything except direct experience devoid of interpretation.

      source

      • crapwittyname@feddit.uk ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        That is why empiricism relies on sensory information.
        So you don’t need axioms for empiricism, just to be clear. Your saying “actually” could make it look like you’re disagreeing, when you’re actually not.

        source
• JcbAzPx@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  the other is just peace.

  That sounds a lot like you consider it a comfort.

  Nothing isn’t peace, it’s nothing.

  source

  • the_q@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Fair enough.

    source