Comment on Corporate media, owned by billionaires, refuse to recognize the wave of democratic socialism
Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 day agoAlright, this is my last message, but I’ll try to explain it. This is an example of DeMorgan’s law.
Let’s call “support” A, and “50%” B, just so we can move it away from natural language. Not A means “not support” or “don’t support”.
The headline can be expressed as “not A < B”. Using DeMorgan’s law, we can change that to an equivalent statement of “A >= B”.
Now, convert it back to natural language and that’s “support >= 50%”.
Again, I’m not making a claim on the validity. I am only expressing what the headline says. Headlines can be wrong, and the article may even contradict it. That doesn’t affect the headline though.
null@piefed.nullspace.lol 1 day ago
I understand your pedantry. And I explained the rationale.
Not sure why you felt the need to restate it, no one is confused.
OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Damn, y’all two are splitting the dumbest fucking hairs.