Comment on This Avocado Oil that claims to be “0 Calories” 🙄
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days agoNo it’s not, oil does not have a “serving size”.
Comment on This Avocado Oil that claims to be “0 Calories” 🙄
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days agoNo it’s not, oil does not have a “serving size”.
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
There is a point to having both - or at least giving an idea of how much an item typically weighs. One cookie might be 200g or 50g; people may typically reach for 1-5 cookies, for example.
A misleading serving size (eg “per 1/4 cookie”) is indeed not helpful at all, but I don’t think it’s illegal.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
So many single-use packets which barely contain enough for half a meal, yet say “contains 2 servings” so they can halve all the numbers on the nutrition label. Yes, this is in america.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 days ago
They had to stop doing this for drinks (at least). They now show the whole bottle contents and sometimes also servings for some sizes.
athatet@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
I don’t think a serving is supposed to be a meal. Pretty sure it’s talking about like, the food pyramid. It’s not a thing anymore but you gotta get a certain amount of Fran’s and fruit and veg and dairy and you count the amounts by serving size.
wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Yeah but the serving sizes aren’t realistic
arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Okay, but let’s say you have 35g of sauce. It’s labeled as 2 servings that equal x calories. Easy math to figure out what you ate.
When 100g is x calories and you have to do the math it’s a bit more annoying. Even worse when you have to break out the scale.