Honestly, to me this is a bad take because only a handful of nations in the world consider to tax their nationals when living outside of their borders.
Comment on just temporarily embarrassed billionaires, one good idea or lottery ticket from making it rich
Steve@communick.news 13 hours agoUS citizens pay US income tax, no matter where in the world they live.
China makes foreign nationals pay taxes on any revenue that comes from China.
You don’t need to end free trade.
Eq0@literature.cafe 13 hours ago
Steve@communick.news 12 hours ago
What does that matter?
The point is that it’s absolutely possible. There is no technical reason it can’t be done, it just isn’t often.FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 hours ago
Is this a bot? It responded to itself.
Steve@communick.news 9 hours ago
I responded to eq0.
Don’t know what you’re seeing
gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 13 hours ago
yeah this is income tax. what about wealth tax?
Steve@communick.news 13 hours ago
The US doesn’t have a wealth tax… Yet
The point is, not taxing leaving people who live outside the country, or aren’t even citizens, isn’t a fixed law of the universe like the speed of light. It’s a policy choice. Different choices can be made. There’s no reason tax law can’t be written to account for it.
gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 5 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/…/Property_tax_in_the_United_Sta…
ok i’m currently reading up on property tax in the US. it’s actually much more interesting topic than i thought. here’s an interesting infographic:
Image
i’m still interpreting what this means. so the US does have a wealth tax but it mostly affects non-movable property (as i said in my original comment) and that is why billionaires don’t actually pay x% of their total wealth under it.
also:
The question is, how do you assess the total wealth of a person, once they have moved their stuff abroad? How do you even begin to measure it? If there’s no local cooperation from the local government to actually check and estimate the total wealth, is there any way to even find out about it?
Steve@communick.news 4 hours ago
The details haven’t been worked out. It may or not include locally taxed properties. California’s one time billionaire tax I don’t think cares if it’s been taxed or not already.
They can’t move a lot of it. It’s mostly shares in companies, bonds, commodities, all traded on public markets. Some is in private markets. But that’s still all managed by banks. Banks all around the world started sharing data in 2016. So governments now have access to people’s international holdings.
Things like cars, boats, paintings, various high value sundries, they have insurance values that could be used.
In short, very carefully. Some things may be missed, but the vast majority of their wealth can be found and calculated.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 hours ago
China is 2nd place for number of billionaires so if they do it isn’t universal or just doesn’t work.
gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 4 hours ago
iirc china does have a wealth tax (and it is effective), just that it isn’t 100% thorough, so some people still become billionaires.
VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de 13 hours ago
US citizens pay US wealth tax… I don’t get what the difference might be.
gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 4 hours ago
the question is, how do you assess net wealth? is there any kind of way of knowing how much net wealth a person has?
there might be, i’d just like to see it.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 hours ago
They pay property taxes, but Bezos’ wealth is in stock and bonds so no he doesn’t currently pay taxes on those.