So the US, with 1/5 the population of China, produces almost half the CO~2~ emissions that China does? How much is that per person? I wish they could get that Chinese level efficiency, maybe they need more solar panels.
Comment on take their money and arrest those responsible
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
Why are we blaming these companies when there’s a much bigger contributor
anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 15 hours ago
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
If you want to measure efficiency, population is not the way to do it, economic output is.
The US has 3/4 the GDP of China with less than half the emissions. The EU also has 3/4 the GDP of China, but less than 1/4 the emissions. Both are far more efficient
thedaylights@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
China builds physical objects for the world. The US sells intellectual property, financial services, with far less manufacturing.
So no, CO2 per GDP is not a useful measure.
When your hospital or HMO decides to jack up the price of a medication, that’s measured as an increase in GDP. When your car insurance goes up, that’s GDP going up.
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
Information has tons of value. I’m not a fan of copyright but I also don’t agree that physical products are inherently more valuable.
Also regarding insurance raises and other price raises. Prices usually rise when demand rises. So it’s a measure of what people want. Much better than just measuring pure survival. Now if all prices rose, that would be inflation, and GDP accounts for that. But if the price of one product rises while the prices of others fall, that’s just shifting consumer demand. Of course GDP isn’t perfect since there can be monopolies, oligopolies, and state-controlled companies, but imo it’s better than using population as a measure.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
This is a bad faith argument. You are arguing the efficiency of a country based upon its CO2 per GDP. That’s kind of a shit argument because GDP is a human construct. Global warming doesn’t give a shit about GDP.
How much “value” a country produces based upon…what, exactly? How much it extracts from the ground? How much value other humans assign to those goods?
Capitalism got us into this fucking mess and you’re still using it as the goddamn ruler.
If you want to compare states, fine, I guess that works as a proxy for cultural differences, but if you are going to compare the efficiency of the people within the state, you measure per capita.
Using GDP is just a shit excuse to be able to defend capitalism.
BigDiction@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Energy is money, and US will use more of it per capita because we have more money per capita. That’s going to be true until there’s a massive economic recession or a technology that greatly increases efficiency.
Or you reduce consumption, but the line going down is not part of the plan for China or the US.
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
Fossil fuel emissions are also a human construct. We did fine before fossil fuels, and even coal. Population is a horrible measure because all it captures is if you are keeping people alive. Even North Korea can keep people alive. But people want more than just survival.
But fine, you want to talk about population? You’re ignoring the second example I brought up. The EU has 1/3 the population of China and 1/4 the emissions. In other words, China is still the problem.
Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 10 hours ago
Why blame China? They do this so you guys can have crappy stuff that won’t last because your country makes you too poor to buy local 😉
hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
I’m sure you’re joking but I do recommend reading Tragedy of the Commons, it’s just a few pages long. Amongst other things, it talks about how regulations need to be applied everywhere for them to be effective.
TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 51 minutes ago
Goddamn you really are just sinophobic for capital.