I didn’t think flock was involved in that.
The point though was the officer just plain lied, and when faced with evidence, he doubled down.
And yes. Officer need to have individual malpractice insurance in my opinion.
I didn’t think flock was involved in that.
The point though was the officer just plain lied, and when faced with evidence, he doubled down.
And yes. Officer need to have individual malpractice insurance in my opinion.
HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Not necessarily a lie, but (allegedly) mistaken would produce the same result.
Not everyone who is wrong is lying.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Nah. Cops writing tickets don’t that leeway. If they aren’t 100% certain of an infraction like this, they shouldn’t be stopping the driver. His doubling down after being shown proof establishes that he is willing to lie.
HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 3 days ago
People can be “100% certain” of things that never happened; it happens all the time.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Yes, but in court, cops are given the assumption of higher accuracy. So they logically should be held to a higher standard.
baronvonj@piefed.social 3 days ago
https://youtu.be/nsysxhgu0fs
This is the incident that modern_medicine is referring to.