Comment

But again, that’s a group. It doesn’t trigger over an entire instance, it triggers only on individual accounts. So it would do absolutely nothing against an issue like that, as I pointed out.

source

Sort:hotnew top

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
It will trigger each individual account and therefor the entire group. There is an easy workaround if they used more accounts but I’m assuming they already used the maximum number of accounts they could get away with if they were botting.

source
- Seleni@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  No? Again, one account, one vote per comment. Each account votes once, on one person’s comment, isn’t going to trigger shit.
  
  If anything, making a ton of puppet accounts and having only some vote in rotation to push your agenda would be the best way to get around it. So it encourages a problem while claiming to fix a problem that isn’t there.
  
  Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.
  
  source
  - FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    At the end of the day each account now has a limit that most humans will never notice, whereas before they could perform as many actions as they desired. It’s the difference between infinite and a very large but clearly limited number.
    
    And if those automated systems hit their limit because the botter issued instructions for them to vote past their limit, then it becomes suspicious behavior which can be used to identify them. Especially true when the botter is part of network utilizing a shared pool of automated accounts.
    
    Worse, it drives off the people who are on Lemmy a lot and make a lot of the content. That idiot admin just wants Lemmy to be silent, and he should just unplug his computer and go touch grass on a mountainside somewhere if he wants silence.
    
    To be clear, in this particular thread we’re discussing a PieFed feature, not Lemmy.
    
    Now, I do agree it should be configurable and toggleable by the instance owners, but I see value in the feature.
    
    source
    Seleni@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    Yes, but PugJesus hosted all his stuff on Pifed. That’s why he left; it was just too much to move.
    
    And again, if he was hitting it regularly, just a regular Lemmy content creator, that limit was way too fucking low.
    
    And again, since the limit is well-displayed, it’s not hard to get around it.
    
    So it’s fucking stupid.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments