Comment on get a job you loser
jve@lemmy.world 1 day agoSo to be clear you “know what illiterate means” and you’re gonna double down on how you think I’m illiterate?
Despite all the evidence to the contrary?
It was not a rhetorical question. You either don’t know the definition, you are lying when you continue to press on it, or you’re a fucking idiot.
Not for most people, no.
Wow ok then. Didn’t realize you knew so much about most people. Thanks for the evidence.
That you can’t read for shit. Either that, or you’re arguing in bad faith. I’m on the fence.
Man, you just fuckin love irony huh?
Yes. Let me ask you a question: do you think all starting teachers die? Or live in the street?
I don’t. Do you think that either of these would be necessary for it to be a non living wage? Do you think all people that work for minimum wage die or live on the street? Or do you think that minimum wage is a living wage?
Don’t answer, this is another rhetorical one, it’s supposed to make you think about something you’re not getting!
Oops my bad. What was the thing I’m not getting?
Photonic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Figuratively yes. (It was a joke, like I said before, but which you apparently also failed to read).
Not that I’ve seen.
So you really wanted me to answer whether I was moving goal posts or forgetting? Uhhuhh…
No problem.
So you think starting out with:
…puts you in the good-faith zone? Yeah I don’t think I’m the one projecting here. LOL
It’s hardly minimum wage. This is a nice example of moving the goal posts. I won’t move with you.
That 50k/yr is a living wage and there are plenty of people who start out with that salary and do fine. And they earn more over the years.
jve@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Sorry so it was a joke or not?
Or is this a joke now.
I really did. Thanks for answering the question both the first time, and the second time when you copy/pasted it.
I guess I could have been nicer when replying to your ignorant comment.
This is not an example of moving the goal posts. This was a clear and obvious example of showing you how bad your argument was.
Specifically, it’s a logical fallacy called denying the antecedent.
Eg if A then B
DOES NOT imply that
If NOT A then NOT B
In many many parts of the us, this is simply not a living wage. It’s borderline poverty.
livingwage.mit.edu
Photonic@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I clearly wrote, for the third time now: the word illiterate was a joke about your lack of understanding a simple written sentence.
Maybe you’re hallucinating things now. There was nothing ignorant about my comment. Your sarcastic bullshit was simply asinine right off the bat. I was having a chat with that other guy and here you come barging in, your idiocy on full display. You’re not projecting that shit on me. Get it away from me.
If they’re not dead it means they’re living. If they’re not homeless it means they have a home.
It was a reductio ad absurdum, and like I said, not questions one should really answer.
Teachers are living perfectly normal lives and they are not all on the brink of poverty. Sure they don’t drive the nicest car, but if that is what you think is important, just go work for Evil inc. instead.
jve@lemmy.world 1 day ago
You did. You also doubled down and yet again with “none that I’ve seen”.
So this was an extra joke? Hilarious.
There was and is. The comment were referring to is the one where you said “it’s not that hard” right?
That ignorant as fuck comment?
So to be clear, everybody who is not dead or homeless is making a living wage? Is that your argument?
This appears to be your standard. Not mine.
If I am misconstruing your standard, what is your standard?
Mine is that they should be able to afford reasonable shelter and food without having to find roommates or other external sources of income.
That is what I used, yes. You did not.
Why do you keep generalizing it to “all”? Where did “all” come into the conversation?
erstrategies.org/…/average-teacher-salary-is-belo…