Comment on Return to office propaganda floating around LinkedIn
Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 days agoThere was an experiment where they simulated LLM performing various company roles. The higher you put it, the more effective it was… xD
Comment on Return to office propaganda floating around LinkedIn
Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 days agoThere was an experiment where they simulated LLM performing various company roles. The higher you put it, the more effective it was… xD
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
LLMs are great at being generalists.
They’d be better CEOs and VPs than most CEOs and VPs.
They read reports that more competent specialists make, and talk with other high level people who do the same.
AKA, they summarize complex data into a narrative and chat.
LLMs probably cost less than CEOs and VPs do.
So why are we trying to jam LLMs in to do the much more complicated jobs they are not so great at doing?
Oh, right, its because the owner class are delusional narcissistic sociopaths who just to feel appreciated and superior to others… and none of this is about making a better run company.
Its about enforcing a social caste system.
Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 days ago
IIRC article well enough, pros were that they were able to talk to anyone at company at the same time, had all data available constantly and were great at drawing normal from data so in standard scenarios they could easily lead the company.
They hallucinated sometimes, but research found that not more than actual CEO’s lol.
What they failed at was exceptional, bad situations. Too little data resulted in choices that ended with the simulated board firing them.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
This is exactly what I mean.
They just actually can do these kinds of tasks as well as people.
… and they’d be less expensive to run, in those roles, than the humans that currently have those salaries and stock options.
Unrealistic, boards haven’t fired or assasinated Elon yet, this is blatant anti-clanker bias.