Comment on Weapons for defense only

MrJameGumb@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

If something is purely defensive and incapable of harming anyone else then it’s not really a “weapon” at all. It would be more like… I don’t know… A really big shield?

It’s a nice thought on paper but I don’t think a big shield being put up is going to convince any other country from producing more weapons.

It may actually lead to them producing more powerful weapons if they think they need to get past a big-ass shield now

source
Sort:hotnewtop