Comment

There is nothing exclusive to steam with respect to Linux support. All of the things required for games to run on Linux which valve support are fully open source and even existed before valve got involved. They just threw money at the efforts and turbo charged it (which is great).

source

Sort:hotnew top

woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

All of the things required for games to run on Linux which valve support are fully open source and even existed before valve got involved.

Yes, which makes it even more puzzling that the competitors don’t even try to capitalize on the success of Steam Deck and publish their own store on Flathub, utilizing the very same FOSS technologies to make the games run.

source
- rambaroo@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Because there’s no money in Linux. Valve can afford to target Linux for long term growth because they aren’t a public company that has to answer to investors every quarter. People mistake that for valve being pro-consumer, which they’re not.
  
  source
  - woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    Because there’s no money in Linux.
    
    You should have a chat with the CEOs of Red Hat, Canonical, etc. about that. They surely will value your opinion.
    
    People mistake that for valve being pro-consumer, which they’re not.
    
    As a consumer, I don’t care about their motivation, I care about the results. Steam Deck is more comfortable to use than Windows handhelds.
    
    source
    Cybersteel@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Companies focusing on long term growth is good for the consumers compared to the ones that only focuses on short term profits. Though why valve is able to do that and other companies like ea or abk can’t is beyond me.
    
    source