Nath@aussie.zone 1 week ago
It is only because I am perpetually online that I recognise the name “Mamdami” and know who he is. Politically in Australia, the new(ish) mayor of New York is not a figure. I can only assume this headline is trying to get attention - even international engagement.
Rather than hanging the potential policy on a foreign name, let’s outline what the actual plan is.
… a new land tax bracket on investment property holdings worth more than $5m, with the proceeds helping to fund a doubling of public housing and the scrapping of stamp duty for first home buyers.
Under the plan, from 1 January 2027, affected properties would face a base charge of $100,000 plus a 5.3% rate on land value above the threshold. The policy, costed by the Victorian Parliamentary Budget Office, would raise about $1.46bn by 2028/29 or $6.4bn over a decade.
As the Greens are not in power, and don’t have the ability to pass such a bill, this is all just a pipe-dream. Even should the Greens win the state election in November, there is 0% chance of getting such a policy in-place by Jan 1.
They’re much easier to support when they have realistic goals.
budget_biochemist@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
The headline is purely a product of the article’s author and/or Guardian editorial staff. Most of the article isn’t even about the Greens investment property tax, it’s about worldwide politics.
The Greens have an alphabetically sorted list for all their policies at https://greens.org.au/vic/policies - the described plan seems to be a more specific Victorian version of part of their Finance and Public Administration Policy - "3. Replace stamp duties with land value tax. "