Comment on đ¤ Interesting
AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml â¨5⊠â¨weeks⊠agoEvery book ever published, every article anybody ever wrote, every comment anyone ever posted on a public internet is âconsentâ to read and learn from it.
Iâm pro piracy as you can tell. The idea that something can be out there publicly on the internet but itâs ânot consentâ to read is the intellectual property one. Look at how they try to gatekeep publicly owned scientific papers. Big AI is clearly hypocritical doing this, but corporations are just soulless, amoral programs executed by sentient humans.
But the RESULT of all that (e.g. deepseek) should belong to all people. And THAT is why these IP arguments by fuckAI are dangerous, because it is only a threat to open models. The answer is open source (or weight) AI models and with advances in computing to run them locally.
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz â¨5⊠â¨weeks⊠ago
Every gps ping your phone sells to ad companies?
AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml â¨4⊠â¨weeks⊠ago
Public information vs private information
Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz â¨4⊠â¨weeks⊠ago
Are you a troll, you just said their is no such thing.
AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml â¨4⊠â¨weeks⊠ago
I said no such thing. Private is private. Iâm saying there is no such thing as public information, information that you put on the public internet, meaning for the public to see, then being somehow not âfreeâ.
You can argue about copyright a little, Iâm against it, but this has nothing to do with private messages or private information or data protection.
Youâre just arguing a strawman and trying to make the discussion about something else and an ad hominem calling me a troll.