I don’t really agree with the original comment, but your response is worse than what you’re responding to. What does what you saw in the modlog have to do with this comment? He really wasn’t that mean, and raises a valid point at least. You could’ve just said “We should’ve checked but it’s still a fun topic” or something that acknowledges the mistake but moves on anyway.
Also, if it costs money for people reading it, why would you share it? I assume you shared it because the cost is worth the price of sharing something you enjoy, but if that’s true why bring up cost at all?
Btw, it’s a bit cliche to respond to criticism with the sentiment of “I’d like to see you do better” rather than accept it for what it is (assuming there is validity to it).
grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Yeah people really hate it when you show them the obvious flaws in their reasoning. We don’t teach people in how to accept correction and learn from it in schools and it really shows. People lash out instead of just taking a moment to check their ego and process.
I’ll try to keep #2 in mind.
TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
I wish people would show me obvious flaws in my reasoning all the time, and am also part of the people
Generalisation is weak
grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Meaning what? Generalization is how things work when you’re talking about populations and not individuals.
TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Blanket measures are inept