Tell that to every publisher constantly flipping a coin on Live Services that are expensive, risky, likely to fail/underperform… but could make them oodles of revenue.
Tell that to every publisher constantly flipping a coin on Live Services that are expensive, risky, likely to fail/underperform… but could make them oodles of revenue.
DillDough@lemmy.zip 12 hours ago
That’s trend chasing lol. They’re just trying to get their own version of things that already exist or if they already have a grade A live service then they create a template from that and apply it to literally everything they touch. They keep failing simply because they are too dumb to understand saturated markets not because they’re taking risks and falling short on something.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 12 hours ago
That is still explicitly a risk that they at taking. That risk doesn’t conflate to bravery, innovation, or a good idea. It is still a risk they take because either their new service flops and they write it off, or their new service makes crazy amounts of money.
DillDough@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
Producing literally any product whatsoever is a risk, the term becomes meaningless when used in the way that you are using it.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
I am just going to have to disagree with you, conflating the idea risk with the things you’re associating it is not appropriate in my eyes. But we can leave it there at this point.