If a minor is provocatively nude in front of a surveillance camera, could they be prosecuted for production of child pornography?
Comment on Pro tip
SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 11 hours ago
Where I live, nudity is not by itself considered indecent, so this would not be true.
So, be sure to rub one out during the crime.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
I wouldn’t be surprised, tbh.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 hours ago
In the U.S. at least a naked child isn’t obscene. Also if they masturbate on camera the police and courts absolutely can still view it.
merc@sh.itjust.works 7 hours ago
If what OP said was actually true, then it would make investigating child porn cases nearly impossible. Someone does have to watch the footage to determine if a crime was committed, and often the people who have to do that end up having major mental health issues as a result.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Someone does have to watch the footage
Heroes - hope they’re nightmare-proof people
DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
Wouldn’t a detective or whatever do that though and not the jury? Or would they actually show a Jury that?
I’m gonna tell them I think they should hang drunk drivers or some other outlandish stuff if they ever put me in a potential jury pool just to make sure I get immediately sent home and never get contacted for it again.
Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
Or it attracts people to these positions that are looking to view these things.
Themosthighstrange@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Hence why the nudist colony of all ages can be naked together. Its completely legal
pulsey@feddit.org 9 hours ago
they called him the rubbing robber
Bratosch@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Nananananananana BEATMAN