Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Referenced nyt article:
Ugh, so glad I read a boring whiny article to try to understand an even more boring conservative take on a cartoon.
TLDR: the nyt author is peeved at bluey for being comforting and at “chip chilla” for being conservative; the conservative is peeved at the nyt author for being peeved at conservative values.
realcaseyrollins 10 months ago
It is far more notable to me that the NYT is mad at Bluey for having present fathers.
Bluey is also popular among adults in ways that I don't think I've seen it kids cartoons in a long time, people find it somewhat comfy. Maybe there's something wholesome about depicting a nuclear family in entertainment.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Present parents are very wholesome and not weird; that’s what I mean when I complain about the nyt article.
I’m irritated at the nyt author for whining about good parents and role models and irritated at conservatives in general.
It’s a good share, but both of these authors are irritating.
realcaseyrollins 10 months ago
Fair enough, and lumping in Bluey with Chip Chilla is probably unfair. I haven't seen Chip Chilla but if it's anything like Tuttle Twins it'll just be right wing propaganda for kids. Even as a conservative I hate that.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Oh it’s a hundred percent ridiculous to conflate the shows.
It’s a lazy, bastardized parallel of all the horshoe theory idiots.