Varyk@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Referenced nyt article:
Ugh, so glad I read a boring whiny article to try to understand an even more boring conservative take on a cartoon.
TLDR: the nyt author is peeved at bluey for being comforting and at “chip chilla” for being conservative; the conservative is peeved at the nyt author for being peeved at conservative values.
realcaseyrollins 9 months ago
It is far more notable to me that the NYT is mad at Bluey for having present fathers.
Bluey is also popular among adults in ways that I don't think I've seen it kids cartoons in a long time, people find it somewhat comfy. Maybe there's something wholesome about depicting a nuclear family in entertainment.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Present parents are very wholesome and not weird; that’s what I mean when I complain about the nyt article.
I’m irritated at the nyt author for whining about good parents and role models and irritated at conservatives in general.
It’s a good share, but both of these authors are irritating.
realcaseyrollins 9 months ago
Fair enough, and lumping in Bluey with Chip Chilla is probably unfair. I haven't seen Chip Chilla but if it's anything like Tuttle Twins it'll just be right wing propaganda for kids. Even as a conservative I hate that.
Varyk@sh.itjust.works 9 months ago
Oh it’s a hundred percent ridiculous to conflate the shows.
It’s a lazy, bastardized parallel of all the horshoe theory idiots.