Comment on .ml has got to be the only place on earth where I'd get downvoted for a comment like this
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days agoThe data has been discussed frequently from this study, and you can find it online, including many of it in the study itself. Again, this seems like deflection.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So you can’t access it. The report itself I mean, not reporting about the report. How interesting that you insist your interpretation is in-scope when you do not actually know what the scope, in fact, is.
Impressive feat of divination, really.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
The data is available as I linked, and my interpretation of the data follows from that data. Simple as that.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bro, it’s behind an access screen. It’s the very definition of not publicly accessible. Access to reporting about the data is not the same as being publicly available, and it’s incredible how you keep moving the goalposts to try and imply you didn’t just blatantly do something blatantly misleading.
I believe we’re done here. I’ve thoroughly established my points as valid, and you’ve done… well, you’ve sure tried.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 days ago
I’m not sure how any of what you’re saying has any relevance whatsoever, and despite my asking you haven’t provided a reason.