Comment on Recent conversations between Dawkins and sentient chat-bot Claudia (Claude)

• snooggums@piefed.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Dildos aren’t smart enough to give meaningful informed consent to sexual intimacy.

  source

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I’m pretty dang sure dildos can’t feel pain. Nobody knows if LLMs can feel pain, because nobody has ever invented a tool that measures qualia. The best we know, is that advanced information processing through neural network information structures appears correlated with qualia.

    source

    • daannii@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      LLMs are probability models. They are not alive. They don’t feel anything.

      source

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        You’re a probability model. Your brain is just spitting out an approximation of the most likely actions to get you food and sex. If you don’t get enough food and sex, your genes die out and evolution tries again with an iteration of a more successful model. All those neurons are just a fancy way of calculating how to eat more bananas and chase more poontang. You’re nothing more than a mathematical equation for reproduction.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Also, why are you arguing in favour of Dawkins having cybersex with a robot?

    source

    • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Saying interactions with LLMs doesn’t involve consent isn’t advocating for any particular action, it is saying that consent is not relevant so it doesn’t matter what people do.

      I would discourage people from cybering or any interaction with the big LLMs really because their design is to encourage constant use and that is a problem not limited to sexual urges.

      source
• LurkingLuddite@piefed.social ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  LLMs aren’t smart … at all, have no sentience, no desire, and no consent to give.

  source

  • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Quiet, I’m trying to spark an AI animal rights movement that will cost OpenAI billions of dollars.

    source

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      That wouldn’t work even if “AI” was intelligent or sentient…

      Animals are, and we still don’t give them rights. They help humans make more money than AI slop.

      source

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Since AI is new, opinion is subject to change. With organic animals, the biggest argument is traditional values, “that’s how we’ve always done things”. Now that we’ve invented robotic animals, and ones that can even talk, we should be giving them rights and protections like children. You know, don’t have sex with the robot, don’t put it to work.

        source

        • -> View More Comments