Comment on Recent conversations between Dawkins and sentient chat-bot Claudia (Claude)

• Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  LLMs aren’t smart enough to give meaningful informed consent to sexual intimacy, so even if it says it consents, I don’t think having cybersex with it is appropriate.

  source

  • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Dildos aren’t smart enough to give meaningful informed consent to sexual intimacy.

    source

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I’m pretty dang sure dildos can’t feel pain. Nobody knows if LLMs can feel pain, because nobody has ever invented a tool that measures qualia. The best we know, is that advanced information processing through neural network information structures appears correlated with qualia.

      source

      • daannii@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        LLMs are probability models. They are not alive. They don’t feel anything.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Also, why are you arguing in favour of Dawkins having cybersex with a robot?

      source

      • snooggums@piefed.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Saying interactions with LLMs doesn’t involve consent isn’t advocating for any particular action, it is saying that consent is not relevant so it doesn’t matter what people do.

        I would discourage people from cybering or any interaction with the big LLMs really because their design is to encourage constant use and that is a problem not limited to sexual urges.

        source
  • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    LLMs aren’t smart … at all, have no sentience, no desire, and no consent to give.

    source

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Quiet, I’m trying to spark an AI animal rights movement that will cost OpenAI billions of dollars.

      source