Comment on 4 rules of firearm safety
Alberat@lemmy.world 1 day agoit’s probably really cheap and reliable to build it that way? that’s what i always assume when i hear “dumb” design for some products
Comment on 4 rules of firearm safety
Alberat@lemmy.world 1 day agoit’s probably really cheap and reliable to build it that way? that’s what i always assume when i hear “dumb” design for some products
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
It’s required for how revolver weapons operate. You cannot have the cylinder floating at all as even a few mm of difference can result in catastrophic failure. People saying revolvers are more “reliable” are full of fucking shit. The damn things are like clocks with their own set of springs and similar to operate.
It was true that early semi-autos were unreliable in keeping from going off suddenly with a round chamber and hammer back. That was early ones though, not today’s. While it’s not 100%, it’s still much safer than a revolver with the hammer back.
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Sig gang
TootTootComingThru@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Didn’t sig make a Turning Point USA edition of one of their guns not too long ago?
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 22 hours ago
You’re not going to find an Obama Hope edition firearm out there.
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Also I was making a joke about the p320going off without a trigger pull
Wakmrow@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
They all do lol