Wait a see what they actually do. Mad idea, I know.
Comment on Instances that didn't block facebooks- thread.net
bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 6 months ago“Wait and see” for what though? Meta is already a known bad actor in social media. Why give them the benefit of the doubt?
HeartyBeast@kbin.social 6 months ago
GONADS125@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Man, I can’t believe the hot stove burned me, again!
Maybe next time will be different…
Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Zuckerberg: I don’t know why. Zuckerberg: They “trust me” Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks
GONADS125@lemmy.world 6 months ago
I forgot about that quote haha. That’s such a great retort to this “wait and see” approach.
Pay attention @Ruud, this is what Mark Zuckerberg thinks of you.
HeartyBeast@kbin.social 6 months ago
Zuckerberg requesting and being given the your intimate personal information, isn't really the same as s Zuckerberg plan to make information on a Meta social network readable from another social network, but sure. I'm not saying Meta is trustworthy, I'm saying let's see what they do. Having a way for people to interact with people on Threads, without having to join Threads could be quite useful.
GONADS125@lemmy.world 6 months ago
There’s no reason to wait.
Look right now, and see that there’s enough justification to say no to federating with Threads.
Yoz@lemmy.world 6 months ago
Lol dumb nerds are the worst. In our company they hired bunch of devs who built the app before the deadline thinking they will get promoted and now most of them are redundant and one works in support.🤣🤣
GONADS125@lemmy.world 6 months ago
If anyone is interested in the very long list of unethical and illegal practices of Meta, here’s some of their rampant inexcusable and repeated shitty practices!