You seem to really value fun, and that is genuinely okay.
It probably seems as if I’m splitting hairs. It might also seems as if I’m interested in conflict (in the memes-conflict dicotomy you mentioned). Overall, it might seem as if I’m an armchair philosopher yelling at the clouds from my ivory tower.
The way I see it, I’m not making a point in that ivory tower. I’m not in the vacuum of philosophy for philosophy’s sake. I actually think I’m doing the total opposite: what happens when we notice what we pay attention to, how the world affects us, and how we affect the world? In other words, what happens when we open our arms to the world instead of closing our eyes to it?
This is incredibly practical.
Every single choice that we make has consequences. It affects people nearby and around the world.
I’m not arguing for us to pretend to be perfect people, whatever that means. I’m arguing for noticing our place in this world and how we are connected to others. I’m arguing for expanding our perspective instead of narrowing it.
Even when we expand our perspective we can still choose memes and fun.
I do it. I’m like you in that sense.
The very small change is noticing that we are making choices and that choices are consequential.
backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
Conflict and philosophy are two you should probably add to your list.