Where is the defence in that comment? They are just saying being trans is not relevant at all.
Comment on average twitter political discussion
Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 days agoYour just coming across as morally the equivalent of a Nazi defender, because they are trans they can’t also be a racist, sexist Nazi? Who is a horrid person and should be banned from the internet and likely locked in a jail cell?
amos@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
That’s not what they said.
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
They are saying that they dislike that the Nazi being trans/autistic is being mentioned at all, it’s not relevant to their “being horrible”-ness even if those labels technically apply, so since the list of things they are described by has so many horrible things,it seems to imply that those are the things by which they should be hated for,not just generic descriptive labels, which is why seeing those two specific non horribleness defining traits stand out. I don’t really care but just trying to clarify. ILYSM
Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It’s relevant if its been used in a court of law to defend a rape they commited.
fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
As I said, I don’t really care since they’re quite the POS and this is not a court of law. I just wanted to give extra context to give proper framing to the point that I felt the other commenter didn’t properly drive through. If you still disagree, fine by me, no need to be so combative <3
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Couldn’t have said it better myself. @Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
Thanks :3