Comment on Why is society at large okay with euthanasia for pets but not for humans?
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 18 hours agoIt’s also what sane people say to people experiencing delusions.
Comment on Why is society at large okay with euthanasia for pets but not for humans?
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 18 hours agoIt’s also what sane people say to people experiencing delusions.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 18 hours ago
The current context is that a layperson with no credentials or experience in psychopathology is handing out medical advice and being a bit of a jerk about it.
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 17 hours ago
If someone said “I am literally God” would you need to be a trained psychiatrist to identify that as a delusion? You would not. Same goes here.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 17 hours ago
Your reducto ad absurdum has no effect because I respect divinekin and think their identities as deities are valid. It’s kind of a terrible argument because you haven’t explained what’s supposedly wrong about any of these identities, you’ve just pointed at them and gone “LOOK AT THAT! IT’S WEIRD!” and expected Me to agree with you. Pretty weak strategy tbh.
a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
I’m not saying it’s weird. Im saying it’s delusional. I’m also not trying to be super rude or dismissive here, I’m just not trying to affirm any delusions, because that can be dangerous (see, for example, ChatGTP, and how its tendency to validate everything someone says can cause a mental health crisis in some users).
Here’s my thinking: but you agree that you are biologically not an animal. And you must agree that you have the mind of a human (we are conversing in a human language, and using the internet, which requires abstract human reasoning to do). And you have the body of a human (you seem to admit as much). So there’s a human mind in a human body. So what’s left? Isn’t that enough to make you demonstrably human?