Comment on What’s the difference between communism and socialism?
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 months agotheir agricultural and industrial capacity was terrible.
Agriculture yes, industrial capacity no.
Comment on What’s the difference between communism and socialism?
FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 months agotheir agricultural and industrial capacity was terrible.
Agriculture yes, industrial capacity no.
AskewLord@piefed.social 2 months ago
dude it took years for anyone to get a car. shortages of basic things like office supplies were common outside of the government, etc
it was shit outside of military production, because basically it all went to military production.
GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
They didn’t want to have private cars, public transit is much more efficient and more pro-social. People wanted cars, so they gave them cars, but the cars were pretty bare-bones and it took a long time to get one.
They did have plenty of issues, and yes, they spent a huge proportion of their industrial capacity on the military. Do you wonder why they spent so much on the military? Because they were heckin’ bad authoritarians? Or maybe it might have something to do with having been invaded and losing 27 million people, and then immediately have their former allies turn on them and become openly hostile immediately after the war.