Comment on Man on a mission
mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 day agoRight. But you do care about other things like them banning step-bro porn in the UK. That is something you’re apparently ok with.
So which is it? When they’re against something they’re good but if they’re doing something you don’t like they’re libs?
You do realize that the same people banning the porn that you dislike are the same people that don’t like transgenders either.
orioler25@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Is this comment meant for another thread…? I don’t know what the sweet shit you’re referring to. Nowhere here or anywhere have I said anything in support of porn bans.
Is this written with like, the assumption that being anti-misogyny is somehow synonymous with being pro-state? Either you’ve got the brainrot from all the bots that feed you your own viewpoints all the time, or this is seriously meant for someone else.
Feminists are often anti-porn on the basis of challenging the male gaze and recognition of the inherent coercion within a capitalist system eroding the ability of women to consent… is that what you think you’re referring to? I agree with these feminist views, but they in no way directly correlate with something like the anti-porn ban in the UK, exactly because it is obviously puritanical in nature and therefore patriarchal.
mechoman444@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban.
My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange.
You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position. There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context.
Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you.
More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse.
Another user called you insufferable. I agree.
orioler25@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Lmfao, you’re shadowboxing yourself. I never even mentioned porn, so I know you’re just assuming these things because you’re pissed at other women, and I can only deduce you’re making up shit they say too.
Weirdest exchange I’ve had on here tbh, I don’t think I’ve had anyone genuinely try to fight me over shit they made up about what other people have said.
Women love me, and I don’t give a shit about men hating me. You’re wondering why you’re an incel? It’s because you clearly don’t see them as people. Only way to stop seeing people like me is to stay inside off the internet forever or kill yourself, you can pick whichever.
mechoman444@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
I don’t think anyone really likes you. I imagine you serve some function in society, so people who work with you tolerate you to some extent. But like you? I doubt it very much.
And this whole “incel” narrative you’re pulling out of thin air is genuinely impressive in its absurdity. Please, I encourage you to continue digging your own sexist hole.
There’s nothing strange about this exchange, you’re just not used to someone calling you out directly. I assume you’re more accustomed to surrounding yourself with yes-men… or yes-women. Yes-people? I’m not sure.
Maybe in another life you would have fit right in with figures like Putin… or Trump.