Comment on reuters.com
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 14 hours agoYou are trying to have a sensible discussion about early memories in a conversation about alleged rape.
Save the argument for another opportunity because it comes across as you being defensive about Altman.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
It only comes across that way for idiots that don’t read. It’s actually important, because a case against Altman has to be very strong. If everyone refuses to talk about the flaky part of the accusation because of feelings, then the whole case is likely to fail when it hits any kind of judicial or media pushback.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Misunderstandings at a broad scale are the fault of the communicator, not the receiver.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
In the case where people respond without reading based on a kneejerk reaction to a couple of key words, I’d say it is the fault of the reader. Communication takes two parties.