This is not true.
Comment on reuters.com
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 weeks agoIt doesn’t matter because if she was raped she was raped and he should face the consequences. But yes. At 3 you don’t remember stuff. She would have forgotten that. No one has real memories from that age.
athatet@lemmy.zip 3 weeks ago
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You are trying to have a sensible discussion about early memories in a conversation about alleged rape.
Save the argument for another opportunity because it comes across as you being defensive about Altman.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It only comes across that way for idiots that don’t read. It’s actually important, because a case against Altman has to be very strong. If everyone refuses to talk about the flaky part of the accusation because of feelings, then the whole case is likely to fail when it hits any kind of judicial or media pushback.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Misunderstandings at a broad scale are the fault of the communicator, not the receiver.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
In the case where people respond without reading based on a kneejerk reaction to a couple of key words, I’d say it is the fault of the reader. Communication takes two parties.
Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Look, just because you were born too stupid to remember stuff from when you were young, let alone read actual research papers, doesn’t mean the rest of us are.