Comment on reuters.com
1984@lemmy.today 2 months agoIt doesnt matter, she was raped between 3 and 13. Are you going to say that this is something a human being forget?
Comment on reuters.com
1984@lemmy.today 2 months agoIt doesnt matter, she was raped between 3 and 13. Are you going to say that this is something a human being forget?
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It doesn’t matter because if she was raped she was raped and he should face the consequences. But yes. At 3 you don’t remember stuff. She would have forgotten that. No one has real memories from that age.
Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Look, just because you were born too stupid to remember stuff from when you were young, let alone read actual research papers, doesn’t mean the rest of us are.
athatet@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
This is not true.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 months ago
You are trying to have a sensible discussion about early memories in a conversation about alleged rape.
Save the argument for another opportunity because it comes across as you being defensive about Altman.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It only comes across that way for idiots that don’t read. It’s actually important, because a case against Altman has to be very strong. If everyone refuses to talk about the flaky part of the accusation because of feelings, then the whole case is likely to fail when it hits any kind of judicial or media pushback.
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Misunderstandings at a broad scale are the fault of the communicator, not the receiver.