Let me ask you something - does your definition of liberals essentialy make them socdems?
Comment on silly costume dance
RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks agoWell, you are misusing established naming conventions and giving off the vibe that you think your definition is the only correct one ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
ddplf@szmer.info 4 weeks ago
RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
No
ddplf@szmer.info 4 weeks ago
Then what it is? I can’t recall any other commonly used definition that would discard the OP’s
RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
The issue is that “liberal” in itself doesn’t say anything about where you fall on the left/right spectrum. It just says you want less regulation of some sort, which can apply to a lot of things. To rail on “liberals” on the internet without using more precise language is naive at best, deliberately inflammatory at worst.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Perfectly summed up.
bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 weeks ago
The closest I have come to a definition is to explain that the political ideology of liberalism is one which puts the greed of the ruling class before the freedoms of the working class. I don’t need to argue about definitions to make that point. We live in a neoliberal world. Look around you - you are forced to work for a living, because of free market economics. You don’t have the ability to just go and live or work anywhere you want. Who has more freedom, you, or billionaires?
RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz 4 weeks ago
Thanks for proving my point :)
bearboiblake@pawb.social 4 weeks ago
Okay! Have a great day, much love, solidarity forever!
BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 weeks ago
So many now believe the propaganda that liberalism, especially neo-liberalism, is “left.”