Comment on New Jersey has no right to ban Kalshi's prediction market, US appeals court rules
usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 9 hours agoThe general public supporting gambling shows there’s a problem with education and financial literacy. Gambling as a whole just funnels wealth from the poor to the rich. At least when gambling is govt controlled, it just funnels money into public services.
Best case you funnel money from thousands of poor people to a single poor person. That’s still just creating a bigger wealth gap. And in most cases, people who win have poor financial literacy, which causes them to lose that wealth in the long run.
Even if you support gambling, why should any amount of gambling DEBT be tolerated? People shouldn’t be gambling money they have but they definitely shouldn’t be gambling money they don’t have.
realcaseyrollins 8 hours ago
Yeah but most people aren't socialists; they don't think that the flow of money must exclusively reduce financial inequalities.
And people should absolutely be able to rack up debt if they want to! But people also shouldn't be allowed to rack up a level of debt that they can't pay within their lifetime, which gambling tends to entice gamblers to do.
usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
Even without the socialist mindset, gambling isn’t creating more rich people. At best it’s creating very temporary wealth for a select few people.
Someone who is poor, capitalist, and financially literate would most likely use their meager money and debt pool to start or invest in a business. At the end of the day it’s about math.
I don’t think gambling works regardless of your definition economic viewpoint.
realcaseyrollins 8 hours ago
Ah, I see where the disconnect is. My position is not that gambling is a way one can make money, nor that citizens should only be allowed to do things which will make them more money.
usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 8 hours ago
Sure, that’s a libertarian stance. Not necessarily an economic stance. Let the people gamble and do meth. Society and logic be damned.