Comment on Linux kernel maintainers are following through on removing Intel 486 support

• djsaskdja@reddthat.com ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  You can, but it’s a bad idea. Pretty major security risk.

  source

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is it?

    Just use Linux 6.12 with LTS until 2029 and Super LTS until 2036.

    source

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Yeah I meant after the support window ends.

      source
  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    What are you running on a 486 these days that needs to be online? A pihole? Like, even if this is a CNC controller or vinyl cutter (if you need a dongle to run your output, this is a valid concern; not a lot of parallel ports hanging out on mobos these days), the internet is not required.

    source

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      We agree completely. Offline is better.

      source
  • TehPers@beehaw.org ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    What kind of security risk are you at running a 486? You can barely handle the TLS handshake. Modern malware would just brick your system the same way any other modern software would.

    source

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I was speaking in general. Everyone’s risk tolerance is different. Offline is better if you can.

      source

      • TehPers@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        My point was more along the lines of online being impractical. Sure, you can still connect to servers running old software (in which case kernel updates aren’t useful to you anyway), but anything with modern security or software is going to just not run at all on it, whether because the software is too heavy for the processor or because it simply was not compiled for it (and cannot be).

        Point is, I think we both agree that the only reasonable usecase for these processors is offline or on a separate network (LAN/tunneled/etc).

        source