Comment on It works better if you put it in your mouth first.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 days agoNot really. It’s not economical and never has been. Civilian use of nuclear energy has only ever been a cover for nuclear arms development.
Comment on It works better if you put it in your mouth first.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 days agoNot really. It’s not economical and never has been. Civilian use of nuclear energy has only ever been a cover for nuclear arms development.
thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 5 days ago
people down voting you haven’t considered the cost of dealing with the waste. Consider how long and expensive Hanford Washington is and how much damage it’s done to the environment around it. Then there’s Fukushima Japan. The damage will be dealt with for a 1000 years. And the reactors that don’t break still have so many spent rods and other waste that can’t just be thrown away. The best idea was to store it in the bottom of old mines but nobody wants it shipped over their backyard to get it there. It’s a dead end.