Comment on The unAbomber. Otherwise, I agree.
queermunist@lemmy.ml 23 hours agoI think the contentious part is you acting sanctimonious about it. I know it rubbed me the wrong way, hence, my sarcasm.
Comment on The unAbomber. Otherwise, I agree.
queermunist@lemmy.ml 23 hours agoI think the contentious part is you acting sanctimonious about it. I know it rubbed me the wrong way, hence, my sarcasm.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I’m not sure it’s unwarranted to explicitly condemn the unabomber here, though. People are unironically praising him in these comments - if condemnation was as obvious as you implied you would have much stronger grounds on which to call me sanctimonious, but right now there’s plenty of people arguing how the effectiveness of what he did distributing in distributing his message and nobody that’s yet pointed out that he was a literal terrorist.
queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 hours ago
And you’re so brave for condemning terrorism.
Warl0k3@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
It’s a rather depressing statement on your personality that that’s what you consider brave, but I’ll take the compliment.
queermunist@lemmy.ml 11 hours ago
You’re being sanctimonious again.
There are the people who agree that terrorism is bad, but want to discuss the things he had to say anyway. For them, you’re just ignoring the premise of the thread with your oh so brave condemnation of terrorism. It’s not that they disagree with your condemnation, but rather, they want to discuss him and the things they agree with despite it.