Comment on When you're the last one on the bus and instantly start living like this
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago… But it’s not efficient for a bus to not be as full as possible. You’re paying more per person per kilometer.
Comment on When you're the last one on the bus and instantly start living like this
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago… But it’s not efficient for a bus to not be as full as possible. You’re paying more per person per kilometer.
autriyo@feddit.org 2 days ago
Cars also aren’t efficient though? I feel like there could be some compromise.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 days ago
Cars aren’t paid for by taxpayers. Roads are, true, but then both buses and cars need those anyway and buses do far more damage.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Lmao leave it to Lemmy to downvote basic facts like “heavier vehicles cause more wear to roads.”
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
And not linearly more wear either. It’s the fourth power of axle load.
My 2 ton car (rounded up) is a ton per axle, a 12 ton bus (empty weight of a common city bus here) is 6 or 4 tons per axle. 3rd axle seems to be more common in buses weighing 15 tons or more (empty). So let’s say 6x more weight per axle. That’s 1296 times more wear.
That doesn’t mean I hate public transit but it does mean it comes with additional hidden costs to the taxpayer. Well, buses do at least. The whole equation is rather different for trains.
mathemachristian@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
I feel like people should be paying their taxes even if they own a car
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 day ago
They’re paying more taxes if they do own cars though?
All I was saying that it’s technically a waste of taxpayer money to run buses half empty so it’s inefficient. Yes, cars are inefficient too, but that extra cost lies more on the car owners themselves and it’s voluntary.