This would never hold up in court, in part due to regulatory capture, but I think this is the only thing that would stop them.
This would never hold up in court, in part due to regulatory capture, but I think this is the only thing that would stop them.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
pcmag.com/…/ai-art-remains-ineligible-for-copyrig…
MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 20 hours ago
Oh, I’m aware of that. Just that courts will not rule against things that involve the use of AI in general. You cannot take the output directly from, but once a human gets involved they will allow it. There’s too many monied interests to allow the restrictions.
inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
That’s the fun part of all of it though, there’s no definition or even subjective ruling of what constitutes “substantial transformation” or any running that generative AI being derivative of copyrighted material, it’s a complete legal clusterfuck of law and consequences.
But yeah, I do agree that if a running or law change came about it would definitely be in the favor of late stage capitalism.
FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 20 hours ago
Doesnt that guy want his ai to own the copyright of the art it makes?