It looks impressive and bad at the same time to me
Comment on Fixed it.
purrtastic@lemmy.nz 14 hours ago
Digital Foundry are gushing over how amazing this is. digitalfoundry.net/…/nvidias-new-dlss-5-brings-ph…
OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Impressively bad.
OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 10 hours ago
Im a console player so the background in the Skyrim clip looked impressive to me, but everything else looked really weird and boring even though it ‘technically’ looked better to me
Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 hours ago
How is the removal of shadows considered to be better lighting in any way?
idealotus@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Ehhhh. I saw the text (“The Real Deal” poster on the window in one comparison). There’s still some artifacting, which to me is a deal breaker, especially if I have to DLSS everything instead of selected items.
But I’m also not a game developer, so I don’t know if the modeling differences are worth the tradeoff for something that most people won’t see in motion.
pewpew@feddit.it 6 hours ago
Yeah sure it looks more “real” but you are losing so much expression and you are making the image look like it was badly photoshopped.
I think half of their comparison screenshots look flatout worse with DLSS 5