Comment on Unconventional strategy.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 14 hours agoThat’s not true. I believe in gods and I’m n antirealist. I think everything is subjective and we should kill the idea of one objective reality.
Comment on Unconventional strategy.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 14 hours agoThat’s not true. I believe in gods and I’m n antirealist. I think everything is subjective and we should kill the idea of one objective reality.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
If you can believe that, then you can believe anything, and you’re one good conversation away from being manipulated and used.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 9 hours ago
I sure can believe anything, I can believe whatever I want. I take choice, agency, and responsibility over My worldview. While realists take no agency and no accountability, they take no active part in shaping their perceptual world. I choose My perception based on My moral compass, but realists can be manipulated into believing anything.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
A realists accountability is to reproducibility and observability.
But if you can believe anything, and that makes you happy, then good. I personally believe red is green and drive how I like. Sure I’ve killed a few people, but that’s in reality so I don’t believe it.
Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 8 hours ago
Wow, you made short work of that strawman! Problem is, this thread is old and we’re deep in a thread, so nobody else is reading this. There are only two people listening to this conversation. Now, obviously a strawman fallacy won’t persuade Me, so I must conclude that you were using that strawman for your own satisfaction, to feel like you’ve won the argument in your own mind, regardless of what anyone else thinks. Which is pretty hypocritical, given you were just making fun of that sort of behaviour.